Wiki Evaulation
Rubric
|
1 Beginning
|
2 Developing
|
3 Accomplished
|
4 Exemplary
|
Curriculum Connection |
Content does not connect to any curriculum objectives in a meaningful way.
|
There is evidence that the content is curriculum related but it is not clearly laid out.
|
There is a clear meaningful connection between curriculum objectives and content.
|
Curriculum objectives are clearly laid out and there is a definite link between material/or task that achieves these objectives.
|
Visual Appeal |
Presentation makes use of graphics, colour and special effects but in the manner these are used it has a negative impact on the content.
|
Presentation makes use of graphics, colour and special effects but their use may have a negative impact on the content.
|
Presentation makes good use of graphics, colour and special effects. The use of these tools enhances the content and the look of the wiki.
|
Presentation makes exemplary use of graphics, colour and special effects, which greatly enhances both the look and the content of the wiki.
|
Organization |
The Wiki content was not organized. The Wiki lacked structure and only contained bits of information. Is not linked to proper folder.
|
The Wiki content was structured and organized for the most part in a reasonable fashion. May or may not be properly linked to proper folder.
|
The Wiki content is organized well, utilizing lists or headings to provide a coherent thought process. May or may not be properly linked to proper folder.
|
The Wiki content is very well organized. It is well structured and laid out. It properly utilizes headings or lists to give it direction. Linked to proper folder. |
Collaboration |
Group member gives minimal contributions to the development of the wiki.
|
Group member contributes a moderate amount to the wiki. Ideas from all are used, but the wiki is managed by only a portion of the group.
|
Group member is active in the development of the wiki. Contributions are noticeable on the wiki.
|
Group member brings their strengths to the development wiki and is engaged in its development. Contributions are important to the wiki.
|
Hyperlinks |
Does not integrate any hyperlinks. No special tags are used.
|
Integrates one or two appropriate links. Links do not work properly. Special tags are not used correctly.
|
Integrates three appropriate links. Some links do not work properly. Special tags are mostly used correctly.
|
Integrates three or more appropriate links. All hyperlinks are accurate and functioning. Special tags are used correctly.
|
Mechanics |
Grammar and punctuation hinders message; editing not evident because numerous basic errors |
Grammar and punctuation slows reader, but message comes across; several errors |
Grammar and punctuation errors are minimal; shows good grasp of rules; errors may be advanced rules |
No grammar or punctuation errors.
EXCELLENT focus on details.
|
Wiki Rules |
Breaks 3 or more of the rules; does not cite sources |
Breaks 2 or more rules |
Breaks 1 or more rules |
Does not break any of the rules :)
|
MLA Citation Page |
No citation page |
Missing resources and/or incorrect form |
A couple minor mistakes such as misplace punctuation. |
Follows all the rules perfectly!
|
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.